Tuesday, 20 December 2016

MAXIM OF MANNER



      A.    Definition
Speaker speaks straight forwardly and clearly and avoids ambiguity or obscurity. These maxims identify a particular set of patterns in interaction and speakers  are expected to make their utterances informative, truthful, clear and relevant.[1]
Maxim of manner is one of the Grice conversational maxim which constitute the Cooperative Principle. The maxim of manner, when one tries to be as clear, as brief, and as orderly as one can in what one says, and where one avoids obscurity and ambiguity.[2] It makes the following requirements :
Be Perspicous :
-          Avoid obscutity of expression
-          Avoid ambiguity
-          Be brief ( avoid unneccsary prolixity)
-          Be orderly
The maxim of manner is related to how something is being said in the conversation. It is one of the four maxim that are part of Cooperative Principle[3] This last maxim indicates that one’s contribution should be clear, direct, orderly and to the point. The speaker should avoiding usning vague or ambigous utterances when speaking. The maxim of manner thus relates “ not to what is said but , rather to “How” what is said to be said”. Levinson thinks that the most important of the sub- maxim of manner is the one that states that participants “ be orderly”. Grice states “ I expect a partner to make it clear what contribution he is making, and to execute his performance with reasonable dispatch”.[4]

      B.     The Proposes of the maxim
            Grice propses this maxim as an explanation for a certain kind of regularity in conversational behavior with respect to the way information is provided at each turn of a conversation
          An elaboration of the Gricean maxim of manner was proposed by Leech (1983: 100), who distinguishes two kinds of clarity: "One kind consists in making unambiguous use of syntax and phonology of the language in order to construct a clear text. Another type  consists in framing a clear message, ie a message which is perspicuous or intelligible in the sense of conveying the intended illocutionary goal to the addressee."
               Horn (1984) suggests that all maxims (except of the Maxim of Quality) should be replaced with two principles: the Quantity principle and the Relation) principle. With respect to the maxim of manner, the R principle states: "Make your contribution necessary; say no more than you must (given Q)." (Horn 1984: 134). With respect to manner, the two principle maximization of informational content (avoidance of ambiguity/obscurity) and minimization of form (be brief) are identified Horn. [5]

      C.    Scope of  Manner
Violations of the Maxim of Manner can take many forms:
1.      Order of presentation of information
2.      Vagueness and ambiguity
3.      Volume and pace
4.      Choice of words
5.      Attitude
6.      Even facial/gestural expressions[6]

      D.    Flouting of Manner
     Flouting a maxim is a particular salient way of getting an addressee to draw an inference and hence recover an implicature. The maxim of manner is flouted when a speaker deliberately fails to observe the maxim by not being brief, using obscure language, not being orderly or using ambiguity. This creates an implicature which makes the participants look for an additional set of meanings.[7] It involves the absence of clarity and transparency of communicative intentions. There are two reasons people flout maxim of manner :
1.       To get attention;sometimes people use identical word in one situation to get attention from others
2.      To be clear.

Example :
            A: I hear you went to the opera last night; how was the lead singer?
B: The singer produced a series of sounds corresponding closely to the score      of an aria from ‘Rigoletto’.
B disobeys the Maxim of Manner, thereby implying that the singer wasn’t very good. But in the Lemony Snicket example, I think the author is being unnecessarily descriptive for stylistic effect, to cause the reader to do a double-take, rather than to imply anything in particular about what the person is wearing.[8]
  
      E.     Violation of Manner
Violation is defined as the unostentatious or "quiet" non-observance of a maxim. A  Speaker who violates a maxim "will be liable to mislead" (Grice, 1975: 49). Violating a maxim is the opposite of flouting a maxim. Violating a maxim prevents or discourages the hearer from seeking for implicatures and encourages their taking utterances at face value.
When violating the maxim of quantity, the speaker does not provide the hearer sufficient information. As for the maxim of quality, the speaker is not honest and provides wrong information. When violating maxim of manner, he / she may say everything excepting what the hearer desires to cognize. Concerning the last maxim, of relation, here one can observe that the speaker endeavors to change the discussion subject or to deflect the hearer.
E.g:      Dad                 : Did you have voleyball practice today?”
                        Daugther         :Yes. I`ve just arrived”
           The girl (who was with her boyfriend at the cinema) violates the maxim of quality as he lies to his father for some reason. (probably the father doesn`t know about her boyfriend).
 A: Did you have fun at your cousin`s wedding?
 B: The location was near a lake, there many guests, italian food, they brought a DJ       from Club
B is ambiguous giving a lot of information about the wedding, exept the response that A expected: a simply yes or no answer, thus violating the maxim of manner.[9] 

F.     Example of the Maxim of Manner
A  :  Where  was  Alfred  yesterday?
B : Alfred went to the store and bought some whiskey.
In the example, B’s answer obeys the manner maxim: be orderly, because she gives a clear explanation where A was.[10]




                                                <<See other related topics>>










[1] Janin Jafari, Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 3, No. 12, pp. 2151-2156,                December 2013 ACADEMY PUBLISHER Manufactured in Finland
[2] https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~haroldfs/dravling/grice.html accesed on 18 December 2016
[3] http://linguisticglossary.hkbu.edu.hk/PDF-HO/Maxim%20of%20Manner.pdf accessed on 18 December 2016
[4] Journal of the College of Arts. University of Basrah, No (50) 2009. http://www.iasj.net/iasj?func=fulltext&aId=53089 accesed on 19 December 2016

[5] http://www.glottopedia.org/index.php/Maxim_of_manner accesed on 19 December 2016
[6] Maxim of Manner pdf accesed on 19 December 2016

[7] Niclas Andresen,  (2013) Flouting the maxims in comedy: An analysis of flouting in the comedy series Community, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Department ofLanguage, Literature and Intercultural Studies, Pdf accesed on19 December 2016
[8] http://allthingslinguistic.com/post/43598609383/an-example-of-flouting-grices-maxim-of-manner accesed on 19 December 2016
[9] Marina Alexandra Raceanu  ,Speech Acts In Profesional English accessed on 19 December 2016
[10] Han- han, http://hancommtheory.blogspot.co.id/2012/04/grices-maxim.html accesed on 19 December 2016

No comments:

Post a Comment